Back
Politics

Australian Human Rights Commission Officials Questioned on Gender Definition, Sex Discrimination Act

Generated on: Last updated: 1 sources
View source

Senate Estimates: AHRC Questioned on Gender Identity and Legal Definitions

Tuesday, 26 May — The Australian Human Rights Commission (AHRC) faced intense questioning during a Senate Estimates session over gender identification and the legal definition of a woman.

Key Exchanges

Defining "Woman"

Senator Michaelia Cash asked AHRC President Hugh de Kretser to define the term "woman."

De Kretser responded that a woman is "an adult human female" and stated this definition includes transgender women.

Senator Cash pressed further: "How can an adult human female also be a transgender woman?"

De Kretser cited the Federal Court's ruling in Giggle v. Tickle (August 2024), which found that transgender woman Roxanne Tickle was indirectly discriminated against under the Sex Discrimination Act when she was excluded from the Giggle app, a platform designed for women.

Senator Cash criticized the Act for failing to define biological sex, calling the situation "madness."

Lesbian Action Group Exemption

The Lesbian Action Group (LAG) had sought an exemption to hold public events exclusively for lesbians born female.

  • The AHRC denied the exemption.
  • The Administrative Review Tribunal dismissed LAG's appeal.
  • The Federal Court later allowed the appeal and set aside the tribunal's decision.

Senator Cash questioned AHRC commissioners on their voting records regarding LAG's request:

  • Sex Discrimination Commissioner Anna Cody confirmed she voted against the exemption.
  • President de Kretser and Race Discrimination Commissioner Giridharan Sivaraman stated the matter occurred before their time.
  • Human Rights Commissioner Lorraine Finlay said she voted to allow the exemption but was overruled.

Pregnancy Protections

Dr. Anna Cody conceded that a transgender woman cannot become pregnant but argued that pregnancy protections in the Act could theoretically apply to a transgender woman based on potential pregnancy.

Senator Cash asked: "What prevents a man from claiming such protections by simply wearing a dress?"

Dr. Cody replied that it would be for a court to decide.

Women's Refuge Example

Senator Sarah Henderson presented a hypothetical scenario:

A women's refuge has a policy banning men after 10 pm. Men arriving at 9:45 pm wearing dresses and claiming to be women could not be refused entry under current law.

President de Kretser suggested the refuge could contact the AHRC for guidance.

Senator Henderson responded sharply: "The Commission has already caused harm."

Other Exchanges

  • Greens Senator David Shoebridge attempted to change the topic, but Senators Cash and Henderson maintained focus on the distinction between biological women and transgender women's rights.
  • One Nation Senator Malcolm Roberts asked nonsensical questions; commissioners did not provide substantive answers.

Stated Policy Position

Senator Cash declared that a future Coalition government would amend the Sex Discrimination Act to define biological sex as the sex at birth.