Back
Politics

FBI Director Kash Patel Files Defamation Lawsuit Against The Atlantic; Prior Suit Against Former Official Dismissed

Generated on: Last updated: 12 sources
View source

Federal Judge Dismisses Defamation Suit Against Former FBI Official; Patel Files New $250 Million Lawsuit Against The Atlantic

A federal judge has dismissed a defamation lawsuit filed by FBI Director Kash Patel against a former FBI official. Separately, Patel has filed a new $250 million defamation lawsuit against The Atlantic magazine over an article containing allegations about his conduct. House Democrats have initiated an inquiry following the article's publication.

Dismissal of Lawsuit Against Frank Figliuzzi

On April 21, 2026, U.S. District Judge George Hanks Jr. dismissed a defamation lawsuit filed by FBI Director Kash Patel against Frank Figliuzzi, a former FBI assistant director and media analyst.

  • The lawsuit stemmed from a comment Figliuzzi made on the MSNBC program "Morning Joe" on May 2, 2025. Figliuzzi stated, "Well, reportedly, he’s been visible at nightclubs far more than he has been on the seventh floor of the Hoover building."
  • Judge Hanks ruled the statement constituted "rhetorical hyperbole" and that "a reasonable person would not take the statement literally." The judge concluded it could not support a defamation claim.
  • The judge denied Figliuzzi's request for attorneys' fees and costs under Texas' anti-SLAPP law.
  • Figliuzzi's lawyer, Marc Fuller, called the dismissal "a victory for press freedom and the First Amendment." Patel's lawyers did not immediately comment on the dismissal.

Defamation Lawsuit Against The Atlantic

On April 21, 2026, FBI Director Kash Patel filed a defamation lawsuit in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia against The Atlantic magazine and reporter Sarah Fitzpatrick. The lawsuit seeks $250 million in damages.

Allegations in The Atlantic Article

The lawsuit concerns an article published by The Atlantic on April 17 or 18, 2026. According to the lawsuit and statements from the magazine, the article reported allegations from anonymous sources, including:

  • Claims of "bouts of excessive drinking," "conspicuous inebriation," and that Patel "is known to drink to the point of obvious intoxication."
  • Allegations that meetings had to be rescheduled due to "alcohol-fueled nights."
  • Reports that members of Patel's security detail had difficulty waking him on multiple occasions because he appeared intoxicated.
  • An incident where security personnel requested equipment to forcibly open a door when Patel was unreachable behind it.
  • Claims that Patel's "irregular presence" at FBI facilities delayed time-sensitive decisions.
  • An account of a technical incident on April 10 where Patel was temporarily locked out of an internal FBI computer system, which the article suggested led him to believe he had been fired.

Claims in Patel's Lawsuit

Patel's legal complaint makes the following assertions:

It describes the article as a "sweeping, malicious and defamatory hit piece" containing "false and obviously fabricated allegations."

  • It denies Patel drinks to excess, has unexplained absences, or that his behavior is a source of concern within the government.
  • It states Patel is at FBI headquarters "nearly every single day" and frequently visits field offices.
  • It characterizes the anonymous sources cited in the article as "partisans with axes to grind."
  • It confirms the April 10 computer incident occurred but describes it as a "routine technical problem" that was quickly fixed, denying Patel "panicked" over it.
  • It accuses The Atlantic of acting with "actual malice," alleging the magazine ignored pre-publication denials, failed to conduct basic investigative steps, and demonstrated "clear editorial animus."
  • The lawsuit states The Atlantic provided the FBI less than two hours to respond to detailed questions before publication and refused a request for more time.

Responses from Involved Parties

  • The Atlantic: A spokesperson stated, "We stand by our reporting on Kash Patel, and we will vigorously defend The Atlantic and our journalists against this meritless lawsuit." Reporter Sarah Fitzpatrick has also stated she stands by her reporting, noting she interviewed "more than two dozen people" for the article.
  • Kash Patel: Patel has publicly denied the allegations, stating, "I have never been intoxicated on the job." He said, "They were given the truth before they published, and they chose to print falsehoods anyway."
  • The White House: White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told The Atlantic that Patel "remains a critical player on the administration's law and order team" and credited decreases in crime to his leadership.

Congressional Inquiry

Following the publication of The Atlantic's article, Democrats on the House Judiciary Committee, led by Representative Jamie Raskin, initiated an investigation.

  • On April 22, 2026, they sent a letter to Patel requesting he complete the World Health Organization's Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) and submit a sworn statement attesting to his answers.
  • The letter cited allegations from The Atlantic's report, stating such behavior "would be alarming to see in an FBI agent" and is "shocking" for an FBI Director.
  • The lawmakers also wrote to Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan urging him to compel Patel to testify under oath if he does not comply with their requests.
  • A spokesperson for House Judiciary Committee Republicans described the Democrats' letter as "unserious" and a partisan effort to attack the administration.

Additional Context

  • Kash Patel was appointed FBI Director by President Donald Trump in February 2025.
  • In a Fox News interview, Patel blamed the "fake news mafia" for the allegations and indicated he would sue for defamation.
  • Senator Dick Durbin, a Democrat, has called for Patel's removal, accusing him of weaponizing the FBI.
  • The lawsuit against The Atlantic follows a legal pattern used by former President Donald Trump, who has filed several defamation lawsuits against media organizations. A judge recently dismissed a $10 billion lawsuit Trump filed against the Wall Street Journal.