Back
Science

Study finds overlooked brain connections predict behavior as accurately as strongest signals

View source

Study: 'Noise' in Brain Scans Holds Meaningful Behavioral Information

A new study challenges the common practice in neuroscience of focusing only on the strongest brain signals while dismissing weaker ones as meaningless "noise." Published in Nature Human Behavior, the research suggests this overlooked data contains significant information about human behavior.

Key Details

Researchers from Yale School of Medicine analyzed brain imaging and behavioral data from over 12,000 participants across four major U.S. datasets. The study examined both functional connectivity (fMRI) and structural (diffusion tensor imaging) connectomes to understand links to cognitive, developmental, and psychiatric traits.

How the Research Was Conducted

  • Researchers calculated the strength of association between individual brain connections and behavioral outcomes for each participant.
  • These connections were ranked from strongest to weakest and divided into 10 non-overlapping groups.
  • Group 1 contained the top 10% of connections—the ones typically selected by scientists for analysis.
  • Groups 2-10 contained the remaining 90% of connections, which are usually dismissed as statistical noise.
  • The team then built 10 separate prediction models, one for each group of connections.

What the Study Found

"Our study suggests that there may be multiple, non-overlapping networks capable of predicting a given behavior just as well." — Lead author Brendan Adkinson

The results were striking:

  • Lower-ranked connections (Groups 2-9) consistently achieved prediction accuracy similar to the top 10% of connections.
  • In some cases, models built on these lower groups performed better than those trained on the top group.
  • The findings indicate that multiple, distinct brain networks can predict the same behavior with similar accuracy.
  • Predictive information about behavior appears to be widely distributed throughout brain connections, rather than concentrated only in the strongest signals.

"To our surprise, even when we completely excluded the networks people usually rely on to predict behavior, we still achieved nearly the same level of accuracy using everything that's typically left behind." — Brendan Adkinson

Implications of the Findings

The findings suggest that focusing only on the strongest brain signals may oversimplify the brain's complexity. This has significant potential implications for understanding and treating brain disorders:

  • For psychiatric conditions like depression, different individuals may rely on different neural pathways to arrive at the same behavioral outcome.
  • Therapeutic targets for brain disorders should not be limited to only the most prominent or well-studied networks.
  • Overlooked networks might hold utility for patients who do not respond to current treatments, offering alternative pathways for intervention.

The research underscores that what is often discarded as noise in neuroimaging may, in fact, be a rich and untapped source of information about the human brain and behavior.