Australia's Quiet Stance on Middle East Conflicts
Australia maintained a quiet stance during the conflict in Gaza, where hospitals were damaged and humanitarian aid was restricted.
International organizations, including the United Nations and the International Criminal Court, used terms such as "genocide" and "ethnic cleansing" in relation to the events in Gaza. Public protests occurred in Australian cities, and some independent senators expressed concerns in Parliament.
The Australian government's official position was described as expressing "concern" regarding the situation in Gaza.
Shift in Policy: Support for Actions Against Iran
Following events in Gaza, actions reportedly turned towards Iran on February 28, prompting Australia to express support. This support was described as "constructive" by Australian officials, aligning with American justifications.
Critics had previously warned that perceived impunity in one conflict could extend to other nations.
Perceived Domestic Economic Consequences
The article suggests that Australia's alignment with these actions, rather than adherence to international law, has led to economic consequences domestically.
These consequences are reported to include fuel price increases, supply chain disruptions, and investment uncertainty affecting superannuation, business loans, and job security.
The author argues that these economic impacts represent a "cost" to the Australian population, who were reportedly not consulted or fully informed about the potential consequences of the government's choices.
Australia's Role as a Participant
The article posits that Australia's silence, diplomatic cover, and intelligence cooperation during the Gaza conflict constituted participation, not mere observation. It claims that choosing not to intervene, sanction, or condemn actions when having the power to do so implies complicity.
While the suffering in Gaza did not lead to a broad public awakening in Australia, the subsequent economic costs could.